The category · auditable by construction

Stop trusting AI you can't trace

The company brain you can audit. Every answer traces back to its source document, and each fragment's permission holds the moment the answer is composed — not just at retrieval.

A new category, not another feature

Not AI search over connectors. Auditability by construction.

The current wave of tools wires up every source, lets a model blend it, and hands back fluent prose. Fluency was never the problem — the number shows up without its proof. Redijo flips the order: the answer exists only if the source exists. Every value carries where it came from, and permission is checked as the answer is composed. That isn't one more bullet on a feature list; it defines a different category.

×an AI answer you can't trace

The edge · permissions at synthesis time

The answer only uses what you're allowed to see

Most tools check access when they fetch a document — then the AI blends everything into one answer, and a restricted number can leak inside an aggregate. Redijo checks each fragment's permission at the moment the answer is written. What you can't see never enters, not even hidden in a total. That's the moat, not a config setting.

  • Permission checked per fragment, at synthesis — not just at retrieval.
  • Every number carries who was allowed to see it; anything outside your access simply doesn't enter the math.
  • Every answer leaves a chained audit trail: what was used, from where, and by whom — the record an auditor asks for.
sample

What was May's gross margin?

38%

pl_may.xlsx · F2:F481 · you have access

Illustrative figure (sample) — not a customer result or a benchmark.

How the proof is born with the answer

Cited by construction, not by trust

Every number points to its source

Click any value to see the file, sheet, range, and the filter that produced it. Redijo separates what was observed in your files from what was calculated from them.

The value path never touches the AI

Calculation and comparison are deterministic. The AI drafts the prose around the numbers; the number itself comes from a path you can re-run and check.

Missing data becomes a gap, not a guess

If an expected file hasn't arrived, Redijo flags the gap instead of inventing a number. A number you can't trace isn't a number you can defend in an audit.

Most enterprise AI tools solve the wrong problem. They connect your sources, let a model blend everything, and hand back prose that reads well. The one question that matters in an audit or a board review is the one they can’t answer: where did this number come from?

Redijo starts there. We’re not another AI search layer over connectors — we’re the company brain you can audit. The difference isn’t one of degree; it’s one of category.

What “by construction” means

Auditable by construction means the proof isn’t a report you generate later, on request. It’s born with the answer. Before writing any value, Redijo locates the data in a file you uploaded and keeps the provenance — file, sheet, range. The number and its source travel together through the whole report. Click the value, see where it came from.

That shifts who carries the burden of proof. In a black-box “trust me” assistant, you have to hope the AI got it right. Here you just review: every number already carries the path back to the spreadsheet.

The value path never touches the AI

There’s an engineering decision behind this. Calculation and comparison are deterministic — the AI is never in the value path. It drafts the prose around the numbers, but the number itself comes from a path you can re-run and reproduce. That’s why the answer is auditable, not merely plausible.

Permission at synthesis time

The second moat is subtler and more important. Almost every tool checks access when it fetches the document. Then the AI blends the passages into a single answer — and a restricted number can slip through, hidden inside a total. Redijo checks each fragment’s permission at the moment the answer is composed. What you can’t see doesn’t enter, not even as an aggregate.

Who it’s for

For the people who sign off on the number: the controller closing the books, the CRE operator reconciling CAM, the revenue-cycle lead defending a claim. For anyone who’s been burned by a black-box assistant that produced a confident value — and had to find the error too late.

Your files are hosted with international-transfer safeguards. Privacy compliance by architecture, not by promise.

International-transfer safeguards and a DPA that support privacy compliance — not local servers. GDPR-grade controls and a full audit trail, so every number is defensible.

Keep going down the decision tree

Where to go from here

Stop trusting numbers you can't trace

Get started and build an auditable report from the files you already have.

DPA for businesses · SOC 2 on the roadmap · cancel anytime